Why to Be Based on NATO C2 Processes?

Authors

  • Raimundo Nogueira Lopes Neto Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA) São José dos Campos - SP - Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22480/revunifa.2008.20.781

Keywords:

Modeling of processes, Command and control, Operations combined

Abstract

Since 2001, Brazilian Air Force (FAB) has participated of courses and exercises combined with other air forces, supported by the French Air Force, aiming at to an eventual enclosure of the FAB in forces of coalition. It arose, then, in the Center of Command and Control of Air Operations (CCCOA), unit of the Command General of Air (COMGAR), the need of restructure the doctrine of job of the Air Force aiming at base on standard utilized by the NATO. Like this, it raised itself to following question that was developed in this article: which are the main processes of Command and Control (C2) involved in operations combined, second the doctrine of the NATO, and as are influencing the doctrine of the Brazilians Armed Forces (FFAA)? The main processes of C2 involved in operations combined like of the NATO and of the FFAA were described in function of the documents produced. It based on the processes raised, was deed a comparative analysis of the documents produced on processes of C2 involved in operations combined of the NATO and of the FFAA, both with emphasis in the Air Force Component. In this way, was possible come out some conclusions from the advantages of the FAB base on processes of C2 of the NATO, despite the processes adopted previously.

References

BOGGS, Wendy; BOGGS, Michael. Mastering UML with Rational Rose 2002. Alameda: John Wiley Consumer, 2002.

BOOCH, Grady; RUMBAUGH, James; JACOBSON, Ivar. UML: guia do usuário. Rio de janeiro: Campus, 2000.

BRASIL. Comando da Aeronáutica. Base Aérea de Natal. Fluxo de documentos. Natal: BANT, 2005a. Aula expositiva do Curso de Centro de Operações Aéreas de Força-Tarefa Combinada.

BRASIL. Comando da Aeronáutica. Comando-Geral de Operações Aéreas. MCA 55-10: manual de condução de operações aéreas . Brasília, DF, 2005b.

BRASIL. Ministério da Defesa. MD33-M-05: manual de processo de planejamento de comando para operações combinadas. Brasília, DF, 2001a.

______. Política para o Sistema Militar de Comando e

Controle. Brasília, DF, 2001b.

CASTRO, Davi Rogério da Silva. Jogos de guerra para o Centro de Operações Aéreas. 2004. 78 f. Monografia (Curso de Comando e Estado Maior da Aeronáutica)–Escola de Comando e Estado-Maior da Aeronáutica, Universidade da Força Aérea, Rio de Janeiro, 2004.

FRANCE. Air Force. JFACC - Battle staff: standard operation procedures. France, 2003.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Air Force. Command and Control: air force doctrine document 2-8. USA, 2001.

VERGARA, Sylvia Constant. Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração. 5.ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2004.

Published

2008-11-01

Issue

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

Why to Be Based on NATO C2 Processes?. The Journal of the University of the Air Force , Rio de Janeiro, v. 20, n. 23, 2008. DOI: 10.22480/revunifa.2008.20.781. Disponível em: https://revistadaunifa.fab.mil.br/index.php/reunifa/article/view/781.. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2024.

Similar Articles

31-40 of 426

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.