Workload of AFA instructors when conducting formation flights training on the T-27 aircraft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22480/rev.unifa.2024.37.616Keywords:
Aviators, workload, flight instructionAbstract
The high cognitive demand inherent in flying is identified as a fundamental factor contributing
substantially to pilots’ workload (WL). This WL, in turn, impacts fatigue, performance, and flight safety. The proposed study aims to evaluate the WL of military flight instructors. Delving into the conceptualization and measurement of WL, the study acknowledges its subjective nature, influenced by various dimensions. The research was conducted with 22 flight instructors from the Air Force Academy (AFA), focusing on formation flights. Methodological procedures included the use of the NASA-TLX questionnaire to measure instructors’ perception of WL. The results indicate
significantly elevated levels of WL, with particular attention to dimensions such as Performance,
Mental Demand, and Effort. This pronounced WL is associated with the constant need to monitor
crucial details during training flights, especially when supervising pilots in formation to ensure the quality of instruction and flight safety. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of analyzing the WL of flight instructors to understand the levels of stress involved and the most influential dimensions in this context. Understanding the intensity of WL and the areas that
contribute most to its formation is relevant for adopting mitigating measures and managing the
mental condition of flight instructors.
References
BEZERRA, F. G. V; RIBEIRO, S. L. O. Preliminary study of the pilot’s workload during emergency procedures in helicopters air operations. Work (Reading, Mass.), Netherlands, v. 41 Suppl 1, p. 225–231, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0161-225.
CAIN, B. A Review of the Mental Workload Literature. Defence research and development Toronto (Canada), n. 1998, p. 4-1-4–34, 2007.
CAO, X.; MACNAUGHTON, P.; CADET, L. R.; CEDENO-LAURENT, J. G.; FLANIGAN, S.; VALLARINO, J.; DONNELLY-MCLAY, D.; CHRISTIANI, D. C.; SPENGLER, J. D.; ALLEN, J. G. Heart rate variability and performance of commercial airline pilots during flight simulations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 16, n. 2, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020237.
CHARLES, R. L.; NIXON, J. Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. Applied Ergonomics, v. 74, n. September 2016, p. 221–232, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028.
DINIZ, R. L.; GUIMARÃES, L. B. D. M. Avaliação das demandas física e mental no trabalho do cirurgião em procecimentos eletivos. 2003. 210 f. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2003.
DUNCAN, J. Pilot ’ s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge. Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, p. 524, 2016.
GARCÍA-MAS, A.; ORTEGA, E.; PONSETI, J.; TERESA, C. De; CÁRDENAS, D. Medicina del Deporte Workload and cortisol levels in helicopter combat pilots during simulated flights. Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte, v. 9, n. 1, p. 7–11, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ramd.2015.12.001.
GRECO, P. C.; CATALANO, F. M.; SOUTO, A. R. P.; RIBEIRO, M. L.; GIORIA, R. S. Historical review and analysis of Santos Dumont’s 14-BIS. 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, n. January, 2003. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-99.
GRIER, R. A. How high is high? A meta-analysis of NASA-TLX global workload scores. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, v. 2015-Janua, p. 1727–1731, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591373.
HANCOCK, G. M.; LONGO, L.; YOUNG, M. S.; HANCOCK, P. A. Mental Workload. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, p. 203–226, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch7.
HART, S. G. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, p. 904–908, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909.
HART, S. G.; STAVELAND, L. E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. HANCOCK, P. A.; MESHKATI, N., n. Amsterdam: North-Holland, p. 139–183, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-010-0111-6.
HEBBAR, P. A.; BHATTACHARYA, K.; PRABHAKAR, G.; PASHILKAR, A. A.; BISWAS, P. Correlation Between Physiological and Performance-Based Metrics to Estimate Pilots’ Cognitive Workload. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.555446.
HERTZUM, M. Reference values and subscale patterns for the task load index (TLX): a meta-analytic review. Ergonomics, v. 64, n. 7, p. 869–878, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1876927.
KRAMER, A. F.; SIREVAAG, E. J.; BRAUNE, R. A psychophysiological assessment of operator workload during simulated flight missions. Human factors, United States, v. 29, n. 2, p. 145–160, abr. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088702900203.
LYSAGHT, R. J.; HILL, S. G.; DICK, a O.; PLAMONDON, B. D.; LINTON, P. M.; WIERWILLE, W. W.; ZAKLAD, a L.; BITTNER JR, a C.; WHERRY, R. J. Operator workload: Comprehensive review and evaluation of operator workload methodologies. United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences, Technical Report, v. 851, p. 903–986, 1989.
MCDALE, S.; MA, J. Effects of fatigue on flight training: A survey of U.S. part 141 flight schools. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, v. 8, n. 2, p. 311–336, 2008.
MURPHY, J. D. Military Aircraft, Origins to 1918: An Illustrated History of Their Impact. Santa Barbara; CA: ABC-CLIO, 2005.
ROLFE, J. M. Whither workload? Applied Ergonomics, v. 4, n. 1, p. 8–10, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(73)90003-3.
ROUWHORST, W.; VERHOEVEN, R.; SUIJKERBUIJK, M.; BOS, T.; MAIJ, A.; VERMAAT, M.; ARENTS, R. Use of Touch Screen Display Applications for Aircraft Flight Control. Digital Avionics Systems Conf. (DASC), v. 36th, n. IEEE/AIAA, p. 1–10, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17346-12.
TAO, D.; TAN, H.; WANG, H.; ZHANG, X.; QU, X.; ZHANG, T. A systematic review of physiological measures of mental workload. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 16, n. 15, p. 1–23, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152716.
VELTMAN, J. A.; GAILLARD, A. W. K. Physiological indices of workload in a simulated flight task. Biological Psychology, v. 42, n. 3, p. 323–342, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05165-1.
VILLAFAINA, S.; FUENTES-GARCÍA, D. J. P.; GUSI, N.; TORNERO-AGUILERA, J. F.; CLEMENTE-SUÁREZ, V. J. Psychophysiological response of military pilots in different combat flight maneuvers in a flight simulator. Physiology & behavior, United States, v. 238, p. 113483, set. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113483.
VIRTANEN, K.; MANSIKKA, H.; KONTIO, H.; HARRIS, D. Weight watchers: NASA-TLX weights revisited. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, v. 23, n. 6, p. 725–748, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.2000667.
WANG, Z.; FU, S. Evaluation of a strapless heart rate monitor during simulated flight tasks. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, v. 13, n. 3, p. 185–192, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1101121.
WILSON, G.F. An Analysis of Mental Workload in Pilots During Flight Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, v. 12, n. 1 SPEC, p. 3–18, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1201_2.
WISE, J. A.; HOPKIN, V. D.; GARLAND, D. J. (Ed.). Handbook of aviation human factors. CRC press, 2010.
ZHENG, Y.; LU, Y.; JIE, Y.; FU, S. Predicting Workload Experienced in a Flight Test by Measuring Workload in a Flight Simulator. Aerospace medicine and human performance, China, v. 90, n. 7, p. 618–623, jul. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5350.2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Furtado de Almeida, Fábio Angioluci Diniz Campos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Revista da UNIFA permite que o (s) autor (es) mantenha(m) seus direitos autorais sem restrições. Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Revista da UNIFA é regida pela licença CC-BY-NC